Detailed Search Results	Return to Search Page
This trial has been rated according to reported aspects of its internal validity and interpretability. To make decisions about the application of the trial to clinical practice it is necessary to obtain and read the full article.

A randomised controlled comparison of alternative strategies in stroke care
L. Kalra, A. Evans, I. Perez, M. Knapp, C. Swift and N. Donaldson (2005)

Journal Title: Health Technology Assessment
Volume 9; Issue 18; Pages 1-94

Method: Randomised controlled trial
Internal Validity Score: 6/8		Statistical Reporting Score: 2/2
• Random allocation: Yes		• Between-group comparisons: Yes
• Concealed allocation: Yes		• Point estimates and variability: Yes
• Baseline comparability: Yes
• Blind assessors: Yes
• Blind subjects: No
• Blind therapists: No
• Adequate follow-up: Yes
• Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes

Eligibility Criteria Specified: Yes

Rating Status: This rating has been confirmed.

Abstract

---

Export References